Maria and Peter’s
Response
This page
contains Maria and Peter’s response to the
letter sent them from Chris at Make Straight Paths, as well
as his further comments.
The following is
an exact, unedited copy of the response received from Maria and Peter:
To Chris
from Ashley (secretary for Maria and Peter)—April 05, 2007
Dear Chris,
God bless you, and greetings in Jesus’ name. I wanted to acknowledge
receipt of your letter to Maria and Peter and let you know that it has
been passed on to them. Thank you for your explanation about your site
and its purpose. Like you, Maria and Peter are not interested in
debating Family writings. It is obvious that we don’t agree on certain
issues, but that is not surprising, considering the many theological
differences between even the vast number of Christian churches in the
world, and Maria and Peter do not expect everyone to understand or agree
with the Family’s doctrines and literature. We respect your beliefs, and
hope you respect ours.
Thank you for the 20 years of service you gave to serving the Lord with
the Family. There are others, like you, who have served the Lord with us
over the years, and then went on to other ministries or places of
service. Maria and Peter wish them, and you, all the best, and that even
though we are no longer traveling on the same path, you, like us, will
continue to fulfill the Lord’s commission to preach the Gospel and
witness and win others to faith in Christ.
Sincerely,
Ashley, for Maria and Peter
Chris’s
Comments
The response from
Maria and Peter via their secretary is brief and does not address any of
the major issues I broached in my letter. It appears intended to be
conciliatory or written in the attempt to bring closure to my doctrinal
disagreements with the Family. It contains several presuppositions that
are worth commenting on.
First, about
conciliation. Ashley writes, “We respect your beliefs, and hope you
respect ours”. An important point should be made here regarding the
principles behind Make Straight Paths. The authors of this web site have
determined that, among other goals, they will uphold the truth of the
Bible first and foremost, that they will examine Family doctrines in the
light of the scriptural truths, and that they will do so in a manner
that does not personally attack individual Family members, past or
present. Therefore, on a personal level, there is not a great deal that
needs conciliation. On the other hand, the Bible expresses the absolute
necessity of searching its pages to determine truth, and therefore a
diligent study of the Bible to discover whether or not Family doctrines
are true is the God-commanded duty of every Family member, past or
present, specifically including Maria and Peter themselves. To spell it
out, if Maria and Peter consider themselves Christians, if they
acknowledge the sovereignty of God and the lordship of Jesus Christ,
then they are under divine obligation to study the Bible, unequivocally
discarding anything that breathes the slightest contradiction with the
express will of God. This is not optional. Likewise, each and every
Family member is personally responsible before God to examine the Bible
for him or herself. Note that this does not mean scanning the GNs for
Bible verses or reading through the Word Basics. An honest examination
of the Bible must first lay aside all Family writings in order to let
the Bible speak for itself.
Therefore, while
I acknowledge that Maria, Peter and all Family members have the right to
believe whatever they want to believe, I also have the right to examine
those beliefs in light of the Bible. In fact, speaking as a person who
was a Family member for about 20 years, I have all the right in the
world to examine what the Family believes. In other words, if Maria and
Peter hope that I respect their beliefs, I can certainly say that I
respect their right to hold certain beliefs if they so choose, but as my
examination of the Bible has shown that many of those beliefs are
incorrect, then I am under no obligation whatsoever to respect the
actual beliefs.
Another point is
one I made in the letter. Speaking with someone about their eternal soul
does not constitute a personal attack on that person. On the contrary,
that is exactly what Jesus Christ commanded us to do when He gave the
Great Commission. Witnessing is no more or less than explaining to
people that their sin is inexcusable before God, Who provided His own
Son as atonement if we throw ourselves on His mercy. The command to
‘preach the Gospel’ does not leave any room for ‘respecting the beliefs’
of the lost sinners to whom we preach!
Ashley writes, “Like
you, Maria and Peter are not interested in debating Family writings.”
Perhaps a point
of clarification is necessary. In my letter to Maria and Peter, I was
speaking to them directly about their souls, about their position before
God. In the letter, my main concern for Maria and Peter was that they
return to God, because it is my opinion that their position before God
is extremely precarious. My letter to them, therefore, was not the place
for an extended discussion of a number of Family doctrines. The most
important consideration was that they get right with God. This is still
my fervent prayer: that Maria and Peter fall on their knees to beg God
for mercy for the way they have led so many away from the truth of the
Bible.
Regardless of the
content of that particular letter, it should be manifestly obvious from
the content of Make Straight Paths that I am extremely interested in
discussing Family doctrines. Make Straight Paths discusses numerous
Family doctrines in great detail. Therefore it is rather misleading to
say that I am “not interested in debating Family writings.”
However, it seems
to be true that neither Maria nor Peter are interested in engaging in
such a debate. The issue here is not one of debate, arguments or
negotiation, but whether or not the Family is living according to the
Bible. It is only the Bible that is “able to make you wise for
salvation” (2 Tim 3:15 NKJV) and there could be no more worthwhile
pursuit than to learn its truth.
Presuppositions
There are a
number of assumptions or presuppositions in Maria and Peter’s response
which are worth identifying:
-
The Family is a Christian group: “you,
like us, will continue to fulfill the Lord’s commission to preach
the Gospel.”
-
The Family has basically Christian
motives, to “win others to faith in Christ.”
-
The Family is one place where
people can serve the Lord: “serving the Lord with the Family.”
-
The issues Make Straight Paths
raises are little more than “theological differences” with
the Family.
-
Many people simply don’t “understand
or agree with the Family’s doctrines
and literature”.
It’s worth
dealing with each of these points in a little more detail.
-
Is the Family a Christian group?
At this point I
want to be careful to explain that I do not believe that all Family
members are necessarily ‘unsaved’. Such a sweeping generalization has no
value. However, neither is it possible to believe that all Family
members are actually genuine Christians, considering the decidedly
unchristian behaviour exhibited by some. In other words, I am willing to
admit that there may be people in the Family who are actually ‘saved.’
Such a judgement (whether or not someone is saved) belongs only to the
Lord, so no human is in the position to examine another person’s heart,
what is or is not within. Therefore, it may be possible that there
actually are saved ‘born-again’ Christians within the Family. I realise
that this statement will never be positive enough for current Family
members, or negative enough for some in the ex-Family community.
I also want to
make it very clear that it is impossible to come to any other conclusion
but that there are people within the Family who are not ‘saved,’ who are
not ‘born-again,’ who are not Christian. It is hard to believe that
people who wilfully persist in behaviour that the Bible condemns as sin
can possibly be part of the kingdom of God. This web site goes into a
lot of detail about these things, so it is not necessary to deal with
specific sins on this page. An important point about ‘sin:’ Sin is not
defined by whether or not you knew something was wrong. If the Bible
says that God regards something as wrong, it is sin whether or not you
know it, whether or not you are able to justify your action with noble
motives, whether or not you can find Bible verses that seem to support
your action. Sin is that which God regards as sin. That is His right.
However in His mercy, He laid down the details in the Bible for us to
read. Unfortunately, a major problem within the Family lies in its
propensity to justify its own teachings using misapplied or
inappropriate Bible verses. This returns us to the need for all Family
members to study the Bible for themselves.
So, having
concluded that there may be Christians within the Family, and that there
almost certainly are those who are not Christian, is the Family itself a
Christian organisation as it claims? I’d prefer to rephrase the question
like this:
Do Family members
respect the Bible? In general, yes.
Does the Family
as an organisation promote Bible memorisation? Yes.
Does the Family
encourage personal Bible study? No, all Bible study in the Family is
superseded by study of Family publications. In fact, personal Bible
study has been explicitly discouraged.
Do individual
Family members really know the Bible? No, there is, at best, a
superficial knowledge.
Does the Family
conform to biblical principals? No, there are a number of Family
doctrines that explicitly contradict Bible precepts.
Do individual
Family members obey the Bible? Again, on a superficial level, perhaps.
On the other hand, the non-biblical Family doctrines are so entrenched
in Family life and culture that it is almost impossible to avoid
participation.
Do Family members
obey Jesus Christ? Selectively. There are certain instructions that
Christ issued that are certainly not obeyed in the Family. Possibly
there are others that are carried out.
So, is the Family
a Christian group? It seems that if your definition of ‘Christian’ is
‘vaguely biblical,’ then the Family is certainly more ‘Christian’ than
they are ‘atheist’ or ‘Muslim’. However, if ‘Christian’ means actively
following Christ, and striving to obey biblical commands, then
unfortunately we must conclude that the Family as a group is not a
Christian organisation.
- Does the
Family have Christian motives?
This is
debatable. Unfortunately, it is not sufficient to claim that the
Family’s main motivation is to “win others to faith in Christ.”
In the first place, the Family’s method of witnessing is highly suspect,
preaching an all-accepting Jesus who came to be a friend. According to
the Bible, Christ called Himself ‘Friend’, but our salvation only comes
because He is also God, who cannot accept sin, and who calls people to
forsake their sinful lives through repentance and personal dedication,
accepting the atonement He made on the cross. In general, The Family
does not witness this message, and so their statistics of many thousands
of instant salvations may have little relation to reality.
Secondly, it is
one of the Family’s stated aims to win others to the Family itself. As
pointed out above, there are too many biblical contradictions to accept
the Family as a genuinely Christian organisation, and therefore winning
people to the Family does not necessarily equate to an increase in the
kingdom of God.
Third, many of
the doctrines practiced in the Family are completely unchristian, which
can only separate Family members from God.
This leads us
directly to the next issue:
- Is it
possible to serve the Lord in the Family?
Probably not. As
it is impossible to remain a full-time Family member without stated belief
in Family leadership, and demonstrated attempts to obey current
teachings, many of which totally contradict Bible principles, then it
seems that it would be impossible to ‘serve the Lord’ while at the same
time living a life that is displeasing to Him.
- Is this web
site quibbling over mere theological differences?
The reference to
“theological differences” is, in my opinion, the most unsettling.
Do Maria and Peter really think that the assertion that their eternal
souls are in mortal danger is no more than a “theological difference”?
Are questions regarding widespread Family practices, condemned as sin in
the Bible, merely religious quibbling? It appears that the message that
Maria and Peter wish to give here is, “We will believe what we believe;
Make Straight Paths is irrelevant.”
Personally
speaking, it is of no great concern to me whether or not Maria and Peter
place any value upon the content of Make Straight Paths. That is not the
issue I address in my letter. The point is this: Maria and Peter are in
terrible danger due to their errors. This is the inevitable conclusion
that will be reached from an honest study of the Bible, not a study of
Make Straight Paths. My plea to Maria and Peter is that they examine
what the Bible has to say about their own actions, their own beliefs,
their own souls. Lay aside all theology, put down all the teachings of
the Family, and read the Bible.
It is reasonable
to say that those who do not wish to examine the word of God to discover
the truth are unconcerned with what God actually has to say. Certainly,
a lack of desire to study the Bible seems to indicate a lack of concern
for the mind of God. It is true that there may be differences of opinion
over the correct way to interpret, for example, “love never fails”, but
when it comes to one’s eternal salvation or damnation, there can be no
room for error.
It is, as the
author of Hebrews says, “a terrifying thing to fall into the hands of
the living God” (Heb 10:31 NASU), and there can be no more important
question to determine if one’s life is pleasing to Him who is able to
“destroy both soul and body in hell” (Matt 10:28). How will we escape,
the Bible asks, if we neglect so great a salvation? (Heb2:3).
- Is it a
matter of simple disagreement, or perhaps a lack of understanding?
I was a
long-term, committed Family member. I studied the pubs more than most. I
compiled ML classes for Home devotions on numerous topics, I took
copious notes of the pubs, researched and made extensive
cross-references to the GNs I read. To my shame, I did not apply the
same zeal to the most precious book of all, the Bible. I understood
Family teaching; I did not understand the Bible.
I do not disagree
over practical matters, like the best country to live in or the optimum
number of people that should live in one dwelling. Those matters are up
to each person to choose as he or she wishes. However when it comes to
Bible interpretation, it should be remembered that the Bible is a public
book, and private interpretations are probably inaccurate. The issue
that I am addressing is that the Bible says that certain widespread
Family practices and doctrines are sin. This is an issue that should be
examined not through the official Family writings, but individually and
personally by each and every Family member. The reason for this is that
when it comes to our salvation, God expects each of us individually to
repent and call upon Him for mercy and salvation. There is no such thing
as corporate salvation. In other words, membership of a church or group
does not guarantee salvation. Each Family member participates to some
degree in the sinful practices, and each needs to find the truth.
This is no mere
disagreement; there is no misunderstanding.
There can hardly
be a more important question.
To conclude, I
repeat my plea: Maria and Peter, for your own sakes, fall on your knees
and beg God for mercy. His merciful loving kindness knows no limits, but
He requires repentance and a forsaking of sin. Family members, please
search the Scriptures to see whether these things be so.
Acts 17:11 Now these were more noble-minded than those in
Thessalonica, for they received the word with great eagerness, examining
the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so. (NASU)
© 2007 Make Straight Paths
Home
|