Makestraightpaths.com examines the teachings of the religious group variously
known as “the Family,” “The Family International,” the “Children of God,” or the
“Family of Love,” and evaluates these teachings from a Christian perspective.
This page is one in a series on the law of love.
Judging on the
Basis of Love
‘Love’ is highly prominent in Family teaching: ‘Love is the most
important thing’, ‘Love never fails’, ‘God is love’, ‘The greatest of
these is love’, ‘What everybody needs is love’, and so on. Love, indeed, is
a biblical concept: God’s love is everlasting and eternal; love is so
much an intrinsic quality of God that the apostle John says that ‘God is
love’ (1 John 4:8). It was love that motivated God to send His only Son
to die for sinful mankind. It was that same love that compelled Christ
to proceed to the cross on our behalf. It is Christ’s love that is
upheld as an example for all Christians to emulate.
Family teaching, however, uses the biblical
emphasis on love to justify actions that God declares are not acceptable
in his sight, it confuses human concepts of interpersonal love with love
for and from God, and elevates 'love' to such importance that it is
allowed to take precedence over other biblical attributes.
This web
page summarises several of the Family's teachings on love, and compares
them to what the Bible says.
“God is love” versus “Love is
God”
While the Bible says that ‘God is
love’, it does not say the reverse, that ‘Love is God.’ Such a concept
deifies the human concept of love, instead of glorifying God
Himself for who He is. God is the sovereign Lord of the universe and as
such He has many attributes: He is righteousness, He is holiness, He is perfection, He
is justice and He is love. The Bible calls all men to worship Him, but
it does not say that He exists as righteousness itself, or as the idea
of perfection, or justice, or love. God is a just God, it is impossible
to conceive of God ever being ‘unjust.’ Yet we are not commanded to
make 'justice' our god. Such an idea depersonalises God to little more than
an idea, a concept, a theory, a motive. God is no ‘idea’: He is a
‘person’ in that humanity was made in His image. He is separate
from His creation and in fact warns mankind not to worship any facet of
His creation. Worshipping the sun or moon, for example, is idolatry.
Worshipping ‘love’ is just as idolatrous. ‘God’ and ‘love’ are not
interchangeable concepts.
For a detailed
study on ‘God is love’ (1 John 4:8), click
here.
To illustrate it
differently, Jesus Christ is the prince of peace (Isaiah 9:6),
Christians are to live peacefully with all men, they are to be
peacemakers and to be at peace within themselves, but they are not to
make a god of ‘peace’ itself, they are to worship God alone, who is the triune
creator of all that exists; He is to be worshipped and He alone.
On these two commandments
While the Bible says that “the
greatest of these is love” (1 Cor 13:13) and that Christians would be
known by their love for each other (John 13:35), and are in fact,
commanded to love each other (John 15:12), the Bible does not say
that such love gives Christians freedom to do whatever they wish, as
long as they are acting in love. In fact, the Bible sets firm boundaries
beyond which no Christian should step, regardless of how much ‘love’
they feel.
Jesus said that the whole Law and the Prophets (i.e. the entire Old
Testament) depend on the two commandments to love God and to love one’s
neighbour.
Matt 22:37-40
37 And He said to
him, “ ‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with
all your soul, and with all your mind.’ 38 “This is the great and
foremost commandment. 39 “The second is like it, ‘you shall love your
neighbor as yourself.’ 40 “On these two commandments depend the whole
Law and the Prophets.”
NASU
In saying this, Jesus
did not declare the Old Testament obsolete. In fact, His
commands to ‘love God’ and ‘love your neighbour’ are actually quotations
from the Old Testament (Deut 6:5 and Lev 19:18). Jesus summarised the
Old Testament, He did not replace it.
Paul declared
that “the whole Law is fulfilled in one word, in the statement, ‘You
shall love your neighbour as yourself’ ” (Gal 5:14 NASU). However
neither Jesus nor Paul implied that such love could have predominance
over, for example, the commandments not to steal or murder. In fact,
Jesus reaffirmed the commandment against murder, magnifying it to a
point where it also encompasses unjustified anger (Mat 5:21-22). In
other words, the New Testament does not say that Christ's law of love
allows Christians to break the Old Testament prohibitions against
idolatry, deception, murder, adultery or lying. In fact, each one of
these prohibitions are reaffirmed in the New Testament: there were sin
in the Old Testament era, and the New Testament specifically declares
that they are still sin.
Of course, the ritual aspects of the Old Testament Law have been
replaced by Jesus' atoning sacrifice on the cross.
For a detailed
study on Galatians 5:14, click
here. Matthew 22:37-40 is
examined
here. Other relevant
scriptures on the Law of Love (Rom 13:8, 1 Pet 4:8, Gal 6:2) are covered
here.
‘Love’ as a
standard of measurement
In the Family,
the teaching is that ‘God’s only law is love.’ In other words, the
Family teaches that the only thing that God actually requires is
love. There are no other laws as such, no other commandments, nothing
else that is necessary. Therefore the ten commandments are irrelevant,
for if God's only law is love, then there is no need for
commandments such as 'Do not murder' or 'Do not steal.' The founder of
the Family (Berg/Dad) explained that if one truly had love then he would
not murder anyone anyway and he would not steal. Therefore all that was
essential was included in the simple law to 'love one another.'
The logical
extension of this teaching is that as there are now no explicit
commandments against specific actions, then those actions might
be permissible if they were done in love. Berg/Dad never argued for the
legitimacy of theft or murder, but he vehemently proclaimed that the Old
Testament commandments against adultery were no longer applicable. He
declared that as the prohibitions against adultery were superseded by
the 'law of love,' then all that was necessary was for one to make sure
that one was acting in love.
Here is the
Family argument laid out logically:
-
God is love.
-
Therefore,
love is God.
-
The Bible
says that we should worship God.
-
Therefore,
we should worship ‘love.’
-
Jesus said
that the Old Testament depends on the commandments to love God and
our neighbours.
-
Therefore,
if we love God we are fulfilling our obligation to Him, and if we
love our neighbours, we are fulfilling our obligation to them.
-
Therefore no
command exists apart from the command to love.
-
Therefore,
‘God’s only law is love.’
As discussed
above, statements 2 and 4 are false: both make a god of a motivation, an
emotion or a philosophy. Statement 5 is a misreading of
Jesus’ words: the Old Testament is summarised by the commandments
to love, but it is not superseded by them. Therefore, statements 7-8 are no more than
fanciful ideas, unsubstantiated by Scripture.
Family logic
continues, however, in an application of these ideas:
-
As God’s
only law is love, ‘love’ is the only rule to obey.
-
Therefore,
anything that is done in ‘love’ is lawful in the sight of God.
-
Therefore,
things that were considered ‘wrong’ according to the Law of Moses
are lawful if done in ‘love.’
-
Specifically
for the Family, the laws against sexual impropriety may be
ignored or sidestepped as long as the participants act in ‘love.’
There is an
important flaw in Family thinking that is never discussed in their literature, being the difference between God’s love and human love.
God’s love exists from everlasting to everlasting; God’s love sent
Christ to the cross to die for sinful man, and it extends mercy and
forgiveness to His unworthy creatures.
Human love
encompasses a wide range of ideas, including romantic love, patriotic
love, brotherly love, parental love, self-love and so on. However none
of these kinds of love are what Jesus was referring to when He commanded
his followers to love each other. For example, it is simply ludicrous to claim that
Jesus meant that romantic love justifies law-breaking.
Jesus explained
that the love He was talking about was His own love:
John 15:12-13 This is My
commandment, that you love one another, just as I have loved you. 13
Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his
friends. NASU
Christians are to
take on Jesus’ love, love which is self-sacrificial to the point of
death. This kind of love can only come from God himself, and has little
to do with human love, romantic love, or sexual love.
Jesus’ commandments
Jesus told
his disciples to love each other, but he did not say that that was all
that they had to do. He expected them to obey him.
In fact, they were to show him that they loved him by obeying his
commandments, and the same holds true for all Christians: We love Jesus
if we obey him.
Jesus gave numerous specific commands to his followers.
He commanded them to have good works (Matt 5:16), to refrain
from anger and lust (Matt 5:22,28), not to divorce (Matt 5:32), not to
judge (Matt 7:1), not to deny Him (Matt 10:33), to forgive repeatedly
(Matt 18:22), to be humble (Matt 20:26), to preach the Gospel (Mark
16:15), to be giving (Luke 6:29), and so on. He
gave many detailed instructions to His followers; He did not think that
the two commandments to love God and one's neighbour were enough.
Jesus did not say that His disciples were permitted to break His commandments as long as
they were acting in love. In other words, He did not say, “Be forgiving,
unless you are motivated by love to seek revenge.” This would be
ludicrous. Likewise, He did not say, “Don’t lust after a woman, unless
you feel you really love her.” Rather, he said, “Don’t lust.”
He said, “If you love me, you will keep my commandments” (John 14:15).
It is interesting, that during the Last Supper discourse, in which Jesus
told his disciples that they were his ‘friends’ (John 15:15), he
repeatedly stressed their obligation to obey him (John 14:15,21,23,24;
15:2,4-7,9,10,12-15,17,20). “You are my friends,” he said, “as long as
you obey me!” This would be a ridiculous statement, if it were not made
by the sovereign Lord of the universe.
The apostle John,
who was present at this discourse, later affirmed this:
1 John 5:2-3 By this we know
that we love the children of God, when we love God and observe His
commandments. 3 For this is the love of God, that we keep His
commandments; and His commandments are not burdensome. NASU
Jesus did not leave His followers with only two commandments, to
love God and love their neighbours. He explained that the underlying
principle of the Law of Moses was love, the purpose of everything that
the prophets said was love, his own motivation was love, his earnest
desire was for the disciples was that they love each other, and in fact
every good deed was to proceed from love, and our relationship with God
was to be built on love, but he did not leave us with the task of
deciding exactly how to apply that love. He did not say, “Just love God
and love each other! Go figure it out!” Rather, he said, “Everything is
based on love, and this is what true love looks like: it is not angry,
it is forgiving, it is humble, it is not judgemental, it does not
indulge in sexual lust, it is giving, it preaches the Gospel” and so on.
Situation
Ethics
The following is
a pertinent excerpt from the book World Views in Conflict by
Ronald Nash:
While a properly
formed Christian worldview allows a great deal of leeway regarding the
positions sincere Christians may take on many of the tough problems that
rise in the formulation of an ethical theory, informed Christians will
have to reject certain views. One such view is the position called
situation ethics, which asserts that Christian ethics imposes no duty
other than the duty to love. In determining what he should do, the
situationist declares, the Christian should face the moral situation and
ask himself what the loving thing to do is in this particular case. No
rules or principles prescribe how love will act. Indeed, each loving
individual is free to act in any way he thinks is consistent with love
as he understands it. The point to situation ethics is, then, that
Christian ethics provides no universal principles and no specific rules.
Nothing is intrinsically good except love; nothing intrinsically bad
except nonlove. One can never prescribe in advance what a Christian
should or should not do. Depending on the situation, love may find it
necessary to lie, to steal, even presumably to fornicate, to blaspheme,
and to worship false gods. The only absolute is love.
A proper response to
situation ethics will begin by pointing out that love is insufficient in
itself to provide moral guidance for each and every moral action. Love
requires the further specification of principles or rules that suggest
the proper ways in which love should be manifested. Because human
beings are fallen creatures whose judgments on moral matters may be
affected by moral weakness, love needs guidance from divinely revealed
moral truth. Fortunately, Christians believe, this content is provided
in the moral principles revealed in Scripture.
In spite of all this,
life often confronts us with ambiguous moral situations in which even
the most sincere among us may agonize over what to do. At times we
simply do not know enough about ourselves, the situation, or the moral
principle that applies to be sure we are doing the right thing. As many
of us also know, weakness of will can hinder moral decision making.
In the unambiguous
situations of life, Scripture teaches, God judges us in terms of our
obedience to his revealed moral law. But how does God judge us in the
more ambiguous situations where the precise nature of our duty is
unclear? God looks upon the heart, Scripture advises. We are judged if
we break God’s commandments. This is certain. But in those cases where
we may not know which commandment applies or where we may have
incomplete knowledge of the situation, God’s judgment will take into
account not merely the rightness of the consequences of our act
(something that we ourselves are often unable to determine in ambiguous
situations) but the goodness of our intentions.
(End of excerpt)
The standard of love
So, is
'love' the
absolute standard by which we must judge all things? Actually, yes, it
is, but it is love as defined by God, not by us. God has laid down for
us in the Bible numerous things which we will do if we are truly loving,
and likewise numerous things we will abstain from. We are truly loving
only if our actions conform to Godly principles, and we are unloving if
our actions contradict scriptural standards of behaviour, no matter how
'loving' we may feel.
The Bible says:
Deut 6:5 You shall
love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and
with all your might. NASU
But then
God
explained that someone who loves God will have no other gods, will not worship idols, will obey
Him, and will obey the other rules of behaviour he laid down. Likewise
Jesus said that God's people were to love him and each other, but then
he explained exactly how that love should look. True love is obedient,
it believes in Jesus Christ the son of God, it preaches the Gospel.
Jesus said:
Matt 22:39 You shall
love your neighbor as yourself. NASU
But then He
explained that someone who loves his neighbour will not steal from them,
will not bear grudges, will be forgiving, will not covet their
possessions, will not lust after them sexually, and will not commit sins
of theft, dishonesty or adultery.
In other
words, God is the only one who decides what is 'loving' and what is not
loving. As a matter of fact, when Jesus commanded his disciples to love
each other, he defined exactly what kind of love he was talking about:
John 15:12 This is My
commandment, that you love one another, just as I have loved you. NASU
Jesus'
disciples are to love each other with Jesus' love, the love that sent
him to the cross.
Conclusion
In the Family,
the biblical emphasis upon love is used to justify a number of actions
which the Bible condemns as sin. God certainly commanded his people to love,
but he also explained precisely how that love would look. In fact, one of
the ways we show our love for Him is by reading His word to learn
exactly what does or does not constitute love.
2 John 6 And this is
love, that we walk according to His commandments. This is the
commandment, just as you have heard from the beginning, that you should
walk in it. NASU
John 14:23 If anyone
loves Me, he will keep My word NASU
Family
members who engage in extra-marital sex are sinning before God; their
actions are not justified by 'love.' The Bible does not say that
God's only law is love, and therefore it does not permit breaking
God's own commandments.
See also
Galatians Five
God is Love... Love is
God?
The Law of
Love in the Gospels
The Law of
love in the Epistles
References
World Views in
Conflict, Ronald H.
Nash, 1992, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, MI, p.45.
© 2010 Make Straight Paths
Home
|